In a federally funded research, researchers from Huntsman Most cancers Institute on the College of Utah (the U) discovered that 7% of Medicare sufferers cross state borders for most cancers care, and charges had been almost double for many who lived in rural areas. This has vital implications for telehealth insurance policies and doctor licensure, says Tracy Onega, PhD, MA, MPAS, MS, senior creator of the research, senior director of inhabitants sciences at Huntsman Most cancers Institute, and professor of inhabitants sciences on the U. A key analysis precedence at Huntsman Most cancers Institute is working to reinforce entry to look after most cancers sufferers who stay removed from a serious medical middle.
Most cancers sufferers, particularly in rural areas, typically journey far distances to obtain specialised most cancers care. However there are limitations on how physicians can observe up with their sufferers and apply throughout state strains, nearly, with telehealth. We will use the information from this research to tell coverage and practices in an effort to take away this sort barrier to well being care.”
Tracy Onega, PhD, MA, MPAS, MS, senior creator of the research, senior director of inhabitants sciences at Huntsman Most cancers Institute, and professor of inhabitants sciences on the U
The team-whose analysis outcomes had been printed in JAMA Community Open-surveyed over 1 million Medicare beneficiaries with most cancers. For sufferers enrolled within the federal medical health insurance program, designed to cowl well being look after People over 65, they discovered that 8.3% of all most cancers sufferers crossed state strains for surgical procedures, 6.7% for radiation remedy, and 5.6% for chemotherapy.
These figures had been a lot larger for rural sufferers. Amongst this inhabitants, 18.5% traveled to different states for surgical procedure, 16.9% for radiation remedy, and 16.3% for chemotherapy.
Onega says telemedicine, the supply of health-related care by means of digital conversations with a well being care skilled, cannot exchange a lot of these providers supplied in a scientific setting. As a substitute, she says telemedicine can fill in gaps in most cancers therapy.
“Sufferers are touring throughout state strains for specialised most cancers therapy providers that have to be executed in a brick-and-mortar clinic-but surgical evaluation and follow-ups may very well be provided by telehealth. A surgeon can observe sufferers remotely, they usually can assess their progress from a distance,” says Onega. “This would cut back extra journey burdens for all sufferers and their caregivers, particularly these in rural and frontier areas.”
Telehealth in most cancers care will also be used to handle treatment-related unintended effects, scientific trial check-ins, and prevention providers.
Onega says entry to this service is especially vital for Huntsman Most cancers Institute, whose clinicians present complete most cancers care to 5 largely rural Mountain West states: Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming. Many sufferers journey far distances to entry well being care, specifically the type of specialised care that is wanted for most cancers therapy.
The usage of telemedicine in well being care has boomed for the reason that COVID-19 pandemic. In keeping with the Nationwide Heart for Well being Statistics, 37% of adults over the age of 18 had been discovered to have used telehealth in 2022.
However hindrances stay. The apply of drugs is ruled by particular person state medical boards and the cross-state licensure insurance policies differ by state. Some states have extra favorable telehealth insurance policies, encouraging linked care no matter location, whereas others have retained decades-old insurance policies predating telehealth applied sciences. Sadly, for a lot of rural sufferers, antiquated medical licensure governance prohibits their suppliers from partaking with them by means of telehealth.
“Some states have reciprocity, which means that a health care provider licensed in Utah may additionally be mechanically licensed within the subsequent state over. However that’s restricted,” says Onega. “It might be nice to broaden these choices in order that we do not have so many of those obstacles for physicians to have the ability to present providers throughout state strains by telehealth.”
Onega says an altered coverage might imply higher outcomes for sufferers, their caregivers, supplier groups, and insurers.
“The sufferers are at all times first. We’ve so many enhancements in most cancers care applied sciences now, a lot of that are benefiting affected person outcomes. Individuals are residing longer and higher lives after a most cancers prognosis,” says Onega. “We wish to guarantee that individuals who stay distant from an city space can have all the identical advantages.”
The analysis described on this launch is supported by the Nationwide Institutes of Well being/Nationwide Most cancers Institute together with P30 CA042014, and Huntsman Most cancers Basis.
Supply:
Huntsman Most cancers Institute on the College of Utah
Journal reference:
Moen, E. L., et al. (2025). Cross-State Journey for Most cancers Care and Implications for Telehealth Reciprocity. JAMA Community Open. doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61021.