First Opinion is STAT’s platform for fascinating, illuminating, and provocative articles in regards to the life sciences writ giant, written by biotech insiders, well being care staff, researchers, and others.
To encourage strong, good-faith dialogue about points raised in First Opinion essays, STAT publishes chosen Letters to the Editor acquired in response to them. You possibly can submit a Letter to the Editor right here, or discover the submission kind on the finish of any First Opinion essay.
The story
“Medical colleges want to supply college students alternate options to state doctor well being applications,” by J. Wesley Boyd
The response
The Dec. 11 article by J. Wesley Boyd is disappointing as a result of it depends on anecdotal and deceptive proof, and harmful as a result of the tone will drive medical college students away from a lifesaving useful resource, particularly Doctor Well being Applications (PHPs). Opposite to claims that applications like PHPs are overused, they continue to be underutilized by medical college students who might significantly profit from elevated referrals and monetary help to entry these very important assets. As a board-certified psychiatrist, habit drugs specialist, present medical director of a PHP, president of the Federation of State Doctor Well being Applications, and previous participant, I’ve seen the transformative influence of PHPs firsthand. PHPs have one of many highest long-term success charges for treating substance use problems and psychological well being situations. At the moment, over 5,000 physicians, trainees, and college students nationwide depend on PHPs to regain their well being and proceed their careers, finally benefiting thousands and thousands of sufferers via competent, compassionate care. Misinformation about PHPs discourages these in want. Anecdotal accounts, reminiscent of these highlighted on this article, typically lack crucial context. Tales influenced by private grievances or incomplete understanding distort the position PHPs play in serving to struggling well being professionals. PHPs work underneath various authorized and structural frameworks, and their procedures — like these of Tennessee Medical Basis-PHP (TMF) — prioritize individualized care and equity.
TMF, as an illustration, conducts triage assessments and refers people for unbiased evaluations, typically lined by TMF’s grants for college kids to reduce monetary limitations. The Washington Physicians Well being Program even companions with establishments to completely cowl analysis prices. Opposite to claims, PHPs don’t obtain kickbacks for referrals. They function transparently, adhering to strict tips that remove conflicts of curiosity. The shortage of applications geared up to handle safety-sensitive professionals typically necessitates out-of-state referrals. These applications that consider a individuals’ health to apply are essentially resource-intensive. Research present PHP individuals obtain distinctive outcomes, with decrease malpractice danger and relapse charges than friends. In a follow-up survey, 85% of individuals deemed the fee “properly value it.” But stigmatizing narratives like this text deter physicians and college students from searching for assist, exacerbating burnout, habit, and suicide danger, whereas jeopardizing affected person security. PHPs have saved extra lives and careers than some other doctor well being mannequin. As an alternative of stigmatizing PHPs, we must always have a good time their lifesaving work and deal with addressing the systemic limitations physicians and college students face when searching for assist. The medical career should tackle inaccuracies about PHPs to safeguard public well being and help our most susceptible members.
— Michael Baron, M.D., M.P.H., Federation of State Doctor Well being Applications, Tennessee Medical Basis, Vanderbilt College, Faculty of Drugs
