Of greater than 12,000 adults within the Netherlands who had been reluctant or unwilling to be vaccinated in opposition to COVID-19 when vaccines had been first rolled out, 86% and 34% had been both vaccinated or mentioned they’d be, in keeping with a examine in BMC Public Well being.
An Utrecht College-led analysis staff analyzed information from a examine by the Dutch Nationwide Institute for Public Well being and the Atmosphere, performed from April 2020 to September 2022 to trace habits and perceptions throughout the pandemic.
That examine recruited a non–nationally consultant cohort from present panels or by social media and surveyed them a number of occasions over 19 months. Most members had been ladies (74%), extremely educated (53%), and wholesome (77%).
Analyses had been stratified into two phases: the lively marketing campaign part early in vaccine availability and the residual part, when everybody was eligible.
Vaccine beliefs not static
Amongst 12,512 members who had been initially hesitant (8,658) or unwilling (3,854) to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine, 86% and 34% mentioned they both had been vaccinated or supposed to be.
Discovering that, for a novel vaccine, vaccination preferences are usually not static and switches in vaccination preferences are related to particular person, social, and contextual elements, has implications for analysis and follow.
In part 1, relative to adults aged 70 years and older, these aged 40 to 54 had 24% decrease odds of switching to vaccination in part 1 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]0.76). These with a medical situation had a ten% greater likelihood of switching than wholesome members (aHR, 1.10). However in part 2, relative to members aged 70 years and older, these aged 40 to 54 had been 44% extra prone to get vaccinated (aHR, 1.44).
Contributors in each phases had been extra prone to change their minds in the event that they believed the vaccines had been efficient (part 1 aHR, 1.76; part 2 aHR, 1.65), thought vaccination was the norm (part 1 aHR, 1.30; part 2 aHR, 1.19), or grew to become eligible throughout stricter lockdowns (part 1 aHR, 1.26; part 2 aHR, 1.09).
“Discovering that, for a novel vaccine, vaccination preferences are usually not static and switches in vaccination preferences are related to particular person, social, and contextual elements, has implications for analysis and follow,” the authors wrote.
